"A picture is worth a thousand words."
How often have you heard that?
Writing and art are really backwards representations of each other. Bear with me, please. It is not as absurd as it sounds.
Both writing and art are trying to achieve something: an imitation of truth. (at least, it had better!). It could be a tangible truth, like the texture of a flower or the color of the sea, or something un-sense-able but just as real, like the strong emotions of joy or the glory of our Lord.
Art and writing are both personal expressions of truth. We try to capture some aspect of it that means much to us. Truth is rather hard to capture and turn into something so small as as the largest painting or fattest book. In fact, truth is so exhilarating that it quite refuses to be captured. Anyone who has written a story or drawn a picture has realized, to both their dismay and relief, that their representation is
nothing compared to the real thing.
But that is slightly off-topic. While I could ramble on that tangent for milliennia, I am trying to explain why writing and art are the same thing, only backwards.
"A picture is worth a thousand words." Is it?
I have often been astounded at the inability of language to portray what is really meant. How often have you read a book with lengthy descriptions (particularly of landscapes or delicious scents) and come away wondering, "What in the world was that all about?"
In order to read a description, you really have to slow down. (Generally this is done the second time through a book, when you aren't anxiously awaiting the events of the next chapter). You have to take each building block and set it carefully upon the next. Only after all the words have been stacked up and formed into a mental image can you have some idea of what the author meant. When you read, you start with the details and build up to the final product.
Art, however, being primarily visual, throws the whole thing at you at once. You see the big picture and are left to discover the scrumptious details.
Surely a picture such as
THIS means more, at first glance, than Alfred Tennyson's poem:
The splendor falls on castle walls/ and snowy summits old in story./ The long light shakes across the lakes...
But both tell the same story. The photograph gives the impression and leaves the details for you. The poem gives you the ingredients and leaves you to mix up the recipe. But both are describing the same sort of beauty. Really, they are the same thing. Just backwards. Writing starts from the ground up and art starts from the sky down. Both cover the same portion of space. You have to stand on your head to see it all at once.
Well, how is that for random? I do so love randomness. :)